To date, a total of 70 IBAs have been identified in Mongolia, covering a total area of 7,906,557 ha or 5% of the national land area. Each of these sites meets one or more of the global IBA criteria developed by the BirdLife Partnership. Sixty-nine sites meet Criterion A1, because they regularly support significant populations of globally threatened species. Four sites meet Criterion A2 because they support the Mongolian's only restricted-range bird species, Mongolian Accentor Prunella koslowi. Thirty-nine sites meet Criterion A3, because they support assemblages of species restricted to one of the biomes in Mongolia. Forty-three sites meet Criterion A4i and/or A4iii, because they hold large congregations of migratory waterbirds. To date, disproportionately more IBAs have been identified in wetlands compared with other habitat types. This is a reflection of the ease with which wetland sites can be delineated and the availability of survey data on waterbird populations compared with other species.
Of the 70 IBAs in Mongolia, 23 are fully included within Special Protected Areas (i.e. national-level protected areas), six are partly included and 41 are currently unprotected. Many of the unprotected IBAs would benefit from official designation as conservation areas, either as Special Protected Areas under national legislation, as local protected areas by the relevant aimag or as Ramsar Sites under the Convention on Wetlands of International Importance, to which Mongolia is a signatory.
Mongolia has a small but increasing number of ornithologists and birdwatchers. In many places, birds and other biodiversity have not yet been surveyed. It is anticipated that future field surveys will identify more sites that qualify as IBAs, especially in forest, grassland and desert habitats, and that the boundaries of some existing IBAs will be refined to reflect new information on the distribution of bird populations.
It is also important to stress that Mongolia’s steppe, desert and taiga habitats are extensive and largely intact, and that the populations of key species they support are usually dispersed. As a result, only a small proportion of these important habitats has been included within IBAs so far, because of the difficulty of delineating sites. Only the best-known and most representative sites have been identified as IBAs. While these IBAs should form a focus for conservation efforts for these habitats, these will have to be complemented by landscape-level conservation actions, covering a much larger area, if the wildlife values of these habitats are to be maintained. Although the IBAs that have been identified in these habitats are considered to be of particular importance, it would be incorrect to infer that land lying outside of their boundaries is unimportant for biodiversity. Indeed, the integrity of the IBAs identified can only be maintained if they are conserved as part of a wider landscape approach to habitat management and conservation.
With the above provisos, the 70 IBAs identified are an excellent first cut of important areas of natural habitat in Mongolia, which can be used with confidence, right away, to guide site safeguard and conservation planning and action.
|